A- de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
✓Claimant Juvenal Basto Rojas Vs. Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional De Administracion De Justicia De Norte De Santander
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Autoridad pública del orden nacional y departamental
- Distintas jurisdicciones
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se ordenó a la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Cúcuta asumir el conocimiento de la solicitud de tutela presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público, la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura- Dirección Ejecutiva, y la Dirección Ejecutiva Seccional de Administración Judicial de Norte de Santander.
Lo anterior, de conformidad con el numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (20 points)
- Ordenar a la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Cucuta asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la solicitud de tutela presentada por el ciudadano Juvenal Basto Rojas contra el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico, la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura- Direccion Ejecutiva, y la Direccion Ejecutiva Seccional de Administracion Judicial de Norte de Santander
- EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
- Presidente
- JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
- Magistrado
- ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
- Magistrado
- MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
- Magistrado
- JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
- Magistrado
- RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
- Magistrado
- MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
- Magistrado
- ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
- Magistrado
- CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
- Magistrada
- MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.